Who must comply?
- Banks, securities firms, insurers, MVTS, VASPs
- DNFBPs (real estate, casinos, lawyers, notaries, accountants)
- Government bodies designating high-risk jurisdictions and applying countermeasures
Key requirements
- 1
Enhanced due diligence on high-risk countries
Apply EDD — proportionate to the risks — to business relationships and transactions with natural and legal persons from countries for which the FATF calls for it (typically the 'black list' and 'grey list').
- 2
Apply countermeasures when called for
Countries must be able to apply countermeasures when called for by the FATF — including limiting business relationships, requiring approval at higher levels, restricting transactions, or prohibiting operations with the country.
- 3
Independent application of countermeasures
Apply countermeasures independently when warranted by the country's own risk assessment, even if the FATF has not called for them — subject to coordination with international partners where possible.
- 4
Communication of high-risk lists
Effective communication mechanisms must ensure that financial institutions and DNFBPs are promptly informed of changes to FATF's high-risk lists and any domestic designations.
- 5
Risk-sensitive measures
Beyond binary EDD/no-EDD, institutions should adjust the intensity of their measures based on the specific risks identified — different countries on the grey list pose different risks (e.g., TF-heavy vs. corruption-heavy).
Practical example
Example: Mexican bank screens a transfer to Myanmar
A Mexican bank receives a request from a corporate customer to transfer USD 200,000 to a beneficiary in Myanmar (currently on the FATF black list). Under R.19: the system flags the country, the file escalates to senior compliance, the bank must (a) demand documentary support of the commercial purpose, (b) verify the beneficiary against UN/OFAC and the SHCP blocked-persons list, (c) apply enhanced ongoing monitoring, and (d) consider whether countermeasures (e.g., flat refusal) are warranted under Mexico's national policy. The transfer is documented and reported to the UIF, which may share with FinCEN.
How Mexico implements it
Country-specific section in Spanish — Mexican regulatory references (LFPIORPI, CNBV, SAT, UIF).
México implementa la R.19 a través de la lista interna y políticas operativas:
Listas GAFI grise y negra
México alinea sus políticas de país con las listas trimestrales del GAFI (febrero, junio, octubre). La actualización febrero 2026 mantuvo en lista negra a Corea del Norte, Irán y Myanmar; agregó Kuwait y Papua New Guinea a la lista gris.
Listas GAFI: países de alto riesgoGuía UIF Países de Riesgo y FT 2026
La UIF publicó en abril 2026 una guía con 20+ indicadores de riesgo país y FT, incluyendo banderas operativas para entidades financieras y AV cuando hay flujos hacia jurisdicciones identificadas.
Guía UIF Países de Riesgo y FT 2026EBR y matriz de riesgo país
Cada sujeto obligado debe incorporar el riesgo país en su matriz EBR (Art. 18 Fr. VII LFPIORPI reforma julio 2025; DCG CNBV para sector financiero). Operaciones con países lista gris/negra automáticamente activan riesgo alto.
Milestones
-
2003
Original Recommendation 21 on countries of concern
-
2007
ICRG (International Cooperation Review Group) review process begins
-
2012
Renumbered as Recommendation 19
-
2025
October 2025 update emphasises proportionate, risk-based countermeasures
Related Recommendations
Other Recommendations in Group D — Preventive Measures
Official citation
FATF (2012-2025), International Standards on Combating Money Laundering and the Financing of Terrorism & Proliferation, Recommendation 19, FATF, Paris, France. Last updated October 2025.
Read the official text on fatf-gafi.org