Who must comply?
- Federal and state police, federal prosecutors
- Specialised AML/CFT and asset-recovery units
- Customs and tax authorities with criminal-investigation powers
- Anti-corruption agencies
Key requirements
- 1
Designate responsible authorities
Countries must designate law-enforcement and investigative authorities with explicit responsibility for ML, predicate offences and TF — with clear mandates and proper resources.
- 2
Parallel financial investigations
Authorities investigating predicate offences must run parallel financial investigations to identify, trace and recover criminal property — making this routine, not exceptional.
- 3
Specialised units
Where appropriate, countries should establish multi-disciplinary task forces and asset-recovery offices to handle complex ML/TF cases — combining police, prosecution, financial analysts, tax investigators and forensic accountants.
- 4
Adequate resources and training
Investigative authorities must have sufficient resources, equipment, technology and training to conduct effective investigations — including modern financial-investigation techniques and digital evidence handling.
- 5
Cooperation with FIU and supervisors
Law enforcement must cooperate effectively with the FIU, supervisors and other competent authorities — receiving and acting on intelligence, providing feedback, and aligning operational priorities.
- 6
International dimension
Authorities must be capable of seeking and providing international assistance through Recommendations 36-40 — mutual legal assistance, extradition and other forms of cooperation.
Practical example
Example: Mexican parallel investigation in a fraud case
Mexico's FGR investigates a corporate fraud. Under R.30, in parallel it opens a financial investigation: traces the funds through bank accounts, identifies real-estate purchases and offshore companies linked to the suspect, requests UIF intelligence on prior STRs, coordinates with the Indep for asset preservation, and requests freezing under the Ley Nacional de Extinción de Dominio. The criminal trial and the asset-recovery action proceed in parallel — not sequentially — maximising the probability of recovering the proceeds before they vanish.
How Mexico implements it
Country-specific section in Spanish — Mexican regulatory references (LFPIORPI, CNBV, SAT, UIF).
México distribuye facultades investigativas entre varias instituciones federales:
FGR — Fiscalía General de la República
Investiga delitos federales incluyendo lavado de dinero (Art. 400 Bis CPF), delincuencia organizada (LFCDO), narcotráfico, corrupción y financiamiento al terrorismo. Realiza investigaciones financieras paralelas en casi todos los casos.
UEAF — Unidad Especializada en Análisis Financiero
Unidad de la FGR especializada en investigación financiera, análisis patrimonial y rastreo de activos. Coopera con UIF para inteligencia y con el Indep para administración de bienes asegurados.
Indep — Administración de bienes
El Instituto para Devolver al Pueblo lo Robado administra bienes asegurados/decomisados, los preserva, vende, subasta o destina a programas sociales. Su existencia hace operativo el principio de la R.30 sobre recuperación rutinaria.
Coordinación con UIF y autoridades fiscales
La FGR coopera con la UIF (inteligencia), CNBV (supervisión sectorial) y SAT (autoridad fiscal con poderes investigativos administrativos). Casos complejos forman fuerzas de tarea multi-agencia.
Milestones
-
1990
Original Recommendation 27 on law-enforcement responsibilities
-
2012
Renumbered as Recommendation 30
-
2024
Updated emphasis on parallel financial investigations and asset recovery
-
2025
October 2025 update reinforces multi-agency cooperation expectations
Related Recommendations
Other Recommendations in Group F — Powers of Competent Authorities
Official citation
FATF (2012-2025), International Standards on Combating Money Laundering and the Financing of Terrorism & Proliferation, Recommendation 30, FATF, Paris, France. Last updated October 2025.
Read the official text on fatf-gafi.org