Who must comply?
- National governments and regulators (must run a National Risk Assessment)
- Financial intelligence units, supervisors and law enforcement
- Financial institutions (banks, MVTS providers, securities firms, insurers)
- Designated non-financial businesses and professions (DNFBPs): casinos, real estate agents, dealers in precious metals/stones, lawyers, notaries, accountants, trust and company service providers
Key requirements
- 1
National Risk Assessment (NRA)
Every country must produce and keep up to date a written assessment of the money laundering, terrorist financing and proliferation financing risks it faces. The NRA should be informed by intelligence, statistics and private-sector input, and shared with all relevant stakeholders so they can use it.
- 2
Designate a coordinating authority
Countries must appoint a body or mechanism responsible for coordinating risk assessment work and ensuring that mitigation actions are implemented across ministries, supervisors and the private sector.
- 3
Allocate resources proportionally
Where risks are higher, countries must apply enhanced measures and devote more resources. Where risks are lower, simplified measures are permitted — but only after a documented assessment supports the conclusion.
- 4
Cascade the obligation to obliged entities
Financial institutions and DNFBPs must perform their own risk assessments at the entity, customer, product, channel and geography levels, document them, update them, and translate the conclusions into their CDD, monitoring and reporting policies.
- 5
Proliferation financing carve-out
For proliferation financing, the risk assessment is limited to the potential breach, non-implementation or evasion of targeted financial sanctions under Recommendation 7. It does not expand other obligations beyond what each Recommendation requires.
- 6
Higher risks trigger enhanced measures
Identifying a higher risk is not enough — countries and entities must demonstrate they have actually applied stronger measures (extra CDD, monitoring, reporting, training, supervision) to address the specific risk.
- 7
Document everything
Risk assessments and the rationale behind simplified or enhanced measures must be written down, dated, and available to supervisors and assessors during mutual evaluations.
Practical example
Example: Mexican fintech designs its CDD program
A Mexican fintech offering remittances to LATAM completes its entity-level risk assessment. It identifies higher risk in (1) cross-border transfers to GAFI-grey jurisdictions, (2) cash-funded transfers above 1,000 USD, and (3) anonymous prepaid card top-ups. It applies enhanced measures: source-of-funds questions, real-time list screening, transaction caps and senior management approval. For domestic person-to-person transfers under 100 USD between two known customers, it applies simplified measures. Both decisions are documented with rationale and shared with the CNBV during inspections — exactly what Recommendation 1 expects.
How Mexico implements it
Country-specific section in Spanish — Mexican regulatory references (LFPIORPI, CNBV, SAT, UIF).
México implementa el EBR a través de la Evaluación Nacional de Riesgos (ENR) de la Secretaría de Hacienda y la obligación reformada del Art. 18 Fr. VII de la LFPIORPI:
Evaluación Nacional de Riesgos (ENR) 2025
México publicó su ENR 2025 elaborada por la SHCP con insumos de la UIF, CNBV, SAT, Banxico y FGR. Identifica amenazas, vulnerabilidades y riesgos por sector y producto. Es la base sobre la que se diseñan las políticas PLD nacionales y la base que cada sujeto obligado debe consultar al construir su matriz de riesgos.
Art. 18 Fr. VII LFPIORPI — EBR para actividades vulnerables
La reforma del 16 de julio de 2025 introdujo la obligación expresa de aplicar un Enfoque Basado en Riesgos a quienes realizan actividades vulnerables. Cada sujeto obligado debe clasificar a sus clientes en bajo, medio y alto riesgo, y aplicar diligencia simplificada o reforzada en consecuencia. Las Reglas de Carácter General que detallarán esta obligación tienen deadline de julio 2026.
Régimen antilavado de MéxicoEBR para SOFOMes ENR (DCG CNBV)
Las SOFOMes ENR ya estaban obligadas al EBR desde las Disposiciones de Carácter General de la CNBV (DOF 2011, actualizadas). Deben tener una metodología documentada, criterios de clasificación y una matriz de riesgos vigente revisada anualmente.
Documentación y supervisión
Tanto el SAT (para AV) como la CNBV (para sector financiero) verifican durante visitas que la matriz de riesgos exista por escrito, esté firmada por el oficial/representante de cumplimiento, esté actualizada y se aplique consistentemente en los expedientes de los clientes.
Milestones
-
1990
Original 40 Recommendations published — risk awareness mentioned implicitly
-
2003
Second revision broadens scope, but no formal RBA Recommendation yet
-
2012
RBA becomes Recommendation 1 — the cornerstone of the consolidated framework
-
2020
Proliferation financing risk assessment added (linked to Recommendation 7)
-
2025
October 2025 consolidated update reaffirms RBA primacy
Related Recommendations
Other Recommendations in Group A — AML/CFT Policies & Coordination
Official citation
FATF (2012-2025), International Standards on Combating Money Laundering and the Financing of Terrorism & Proliferation, Recommendation 1, FATF, Paris, France. Last updated October 2025.
Read the official text on fatf-gafi.org